{"id":95994,"date":"2021-06-13T12:27:43","date_gmt":"2021-06-13T06:57:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.icsf.net\/?post_type=samudra&p=95994"},"modified":"2022-07-08T11:32:09","modified_gmt":"2022-07-08T06:02:09","slug":"argentina-treaty-with-the-european-economic-community","status":"publish","type":"samudra","link":"https:\/\/www.icsf.net\/samudra\/argentina-treaty-with-the-european-economic-community\/","title":{"rendered":"Argentina: Treaty with the European Economic Community"},"content":{"rendered":"

European experience, specially that of some of the new members of the Community, has been difficult in terms of relations with African countries, for example. The impact of new treaties has been initially negative for fishworkers and for those countries, in general. Although significant financial resources have been in- volved, CEE ships have taken over artisan fishing grounds in Senegal, for example, destroying fishing skills and triggering social conflict. The treaties have given priority to companies connected with local governing groups and have generated profits at the cost of artisan fishworkers and the countries, as a whole.<\/p>\n

Serious conflicts arose in Namibia over the presence of Spanish trolling fleets taking herring. That new country expelled those fleets from its jurisdictional waters, while a new treaty with the CEE has not yet been signed, given that Namibia is seeking to impose severe restrictions.<\/p>\n

Europeans claim to be aware of those difficulties and, for that reason, have created so-called \u201csecond generation treaties\u201d, such as that signed with Argentina at the end of 1992.<\/p>\n

The main points of that treaty should be considered by fishworkers throughout the world because it may affect them eventually:<\/p>\n