{"id":46160,"date":"2021-06-16T16:02:16","date_gmt":"2021-06-16T16:02:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/dev6.blazedream.in\/ICSF\/samudra\/samudra-for-fortaleza-issue-2"},"modified":"2021-08-18T15:42:25","modified_gmt":"2021-08-18T15:42:25","slug":"samudra-for-fortaleza-issue-2","status":"publish","type":"samudra","link":"https:\/\/www.icsf.net\/samudra\/samudra-for-fortaleza-issue-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Samudra for Fortaleza – Issue 2"},"content":{"rendered":"
SAMUDRA \u0096 FORTALEZA No.2 (5 July 2006)<\/span> <\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Today’s Agenda<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n <\/span><\/i><\/b><\/p>\n <\/i><\/b><\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/i><\/b><\/i><\/b><\/p>\n Marginally…<\/span><\/i><\/b><\/p>\n A total of 57 participants are here at Fortaleza to deliberate, over three days, issues dealing with fisheries and fishworkers. Most of the participants (41) are from the South, while eight are from the North. In terms of geographic spread, Latin America is best represented, with 27 participants, while Asia and Africa have seven each.<\/span><\/p>\n The country-wise breakup is as follows:<\/span><\/p>\n Argentina 2; Brazil 18; Chile 5; France 3; Ghana 1; Guinea Conakry 1; India 4; Mauritania 1; Netherlands 3; Norway 1; Peru 2; Italy 1; Senegal 2; South Africa 2; Sri Lanka 1; Thailand 2; (Secretariat 8).<\/span><\/p>\n <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n <\/b><\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/b><\/b><\/p>\n What’s Inside<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n Reflections ……………… 2<\/span><\/p>\n Sound Bites ……………. 2<\/span><\/p>\n On the Web ……………. 3<\/span><\/p>\n Darwin’s Nightmare…… 4<\/span><\/p>\n Portuguese …………….. 4<\/span><\/p>\n <\/span><\/p>\n Looking at ICSF at 20<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n As ICSF enters the adolescence stage, seven of the Founding Members got together to reminisce about the pastand ponder the future<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n The workshop kicked off with Rene Scharer of Instituto Terrmar, the co-host, and Chandrika Sharma, Executive Secretary of ICSF, warmly welcoming the participants to Fortaleza, and hoping that the next three days would see much meaningful discussion on the various issues that have brought them together. <\/span><\/p>\n In an overview of ICSF, Chandrika Sharma outlined the work done by the organization since its formation in Trivandrum, India, in 1986 by a group of concerned individuals from 18 countries, in response to an invitation from the Centre for Development Studies (CDS) and the South Indian Federation of Fishermen Societies (SIFFS).<\/span><\/p>\n Since then, ICSF has been working on issues that affect the artisanal and small-scale fisheries sector, especially in the developing world. It has taken part in and itself organized several significant conferences on these issues.<\/span><\/p>\n ICSF has engaged with several UN processes on issues ranging from labour (for instance, highlighting the need to include small-scale fishers under the proposed ILO Convention and Recommendation on Working Conditions in the Fisheries Sector); recognition of the rights of small-scale fishworkers and communities in fisheries and biodiversity management within a larger oceans\/ biodiversity perspective (UNCED, FAO, CBD); the rights of small-scale fishworkers to highly migratory fish stocks (UN Fish Stocks Agreement) and the fishing subsidies debate (UN Environment Programme). <\/span><\/p>\n ICSF is a founder member of the Coalition for Fair Fisheries Arrangements (CFFA), which campaigns for fair and equitable fisheries arrangement between the EU and the African, Caribbean and the Pacific (ACP) countries. <\/span><\/p>\n ICSF, Chandrika said, has also worked steadfastly to foster a gender perspective within fishworker organizations. The organization has been especially successful in disseminating infor mation and analysis through its varied output, ranging from publications like SAMUDRA Report<\/i>, Monographs and Dossiers, the Yemaya women-in-fisheries newsletter and other studies, and the ICSF website, SAMUDRA News Alerts and multimedia products.<\/span><\/p>\n After that overview, seven of the Founding Members reflected on 20 years of ICSF. John Kurien recalled that the original founders of ICSF did not go to Rome (and, subsequently, to Trivandrum) as individuals but with the strong backing of people involved in fisheries. The support of this large number of people worked towards creating a network that is a force to reckon with in the world of fisheries development.<\/span><\/p>\n Cornelie Quist recalled that her 22 years of involvement with the ICSF process has been a unique experience of mission and vision, and friendship shared between members. ICSF has played an important role in the valorization of artisanal fisheries at the local and international levels. This became very evident in ICSF’s involvement in the post-tsunami work.<\/span><\/p>\n ICSF has not only championed the cause of artisanal fishworkers, Cornelie added, but also of women fishworkers and vendors. ICSF’s effort to integrate a gender perspective into the dominant discourse was most challenging and unique, so much so that today women’s role in artisanal fisheries has been more or less acknowledged.<\/span><\/p>\n The greatest contribution of ICSF, Cornelie summed up, relates to the conceptual and contextual analysis of fisheries development. She hoped that in the coming triennium ICSF would take up the challenge of a more integrated approach to fisheries policymaking.<\/span><\/p>\n Hector Luis Morales characterized ICSF as a network of not only support but also tolerance. It is important for ICSF to recognize and address the environmental and social changes that have taken place over the past 20 years. The future lies in allowing communities to be stakeholders in the struggle, he said.<\/span><\/p>\n Nalini Nayak chose to highlight what she labeled as \u0093some of the confusions that have evolved over the last 20 years. When ICSF was started, the founders and supporters seemed to be rather sure what the small-scale sector in the Southern part of the world was and quite sure of whom to support. Massive changes have since taken place and, Nalini added, \u0093I am rather confused who the small-scale sector includes and what it represents. This is one of the challenges for us to redefine with our fishworker friends \u0096 who we are going to support and for what in the coming years?<\/span><\/p>\n Although ICSF has given importance to the question of women in fisheries, Nalini pointed out, the issue has not gained much ground, mainly because ICSF’s principal constituency has been fishworker organizations, which are mainly male-dominated. Where the local community is given power in decision- making processes, there women definitely play a role. Nalini hoped that in the coming decade, ICSF would be able to articulate and realize the concept of sustainability where women, men and nature do actually matter.<\/span><\/p>\n Rolf Willmann, Senior Fisheries Officer, FAO, said that ICSF has become mainstream for FAO and is filling a void to counterbalance the presence of the environmental groups by representing the fisheries sector, in general, and fishworkers, in particular. Though ICSF is now mainstream, Rolf said, the crucial issue is translating good policies into ground realities so that we can see real changes in the lives of fishing communities.<\/span><\/p>\n James Smith recalled that one of the things that impressed him most at the Rome conference was how the organizers were able to allow the voices of fishworkers from the villages to reach the international level. As for the future, James pointed to the need to think in terms of workers’ and human rights, and the place that fishworkers should find in the maritime world. There should be fewer and fewer distinctions between the workers in the maritime field, he said.<\/span><\/p>\n A minute’s silence was observed in memory of Michael Belliveau, a Founding Member of ICSF, who passed away in 2002. Just before the reminiscence session ended, Nalini reminded the audience that there were actually not just the seven at the founding meeting of ICSF, but a total of around 24 people who came together. Some of them have since moved out due to a lesser involvement with the sector as a whole, while some others remain very active, although at the periphery. In conclusion, Rene quipped, \u0093If ICSF didn’t exist, we would have had to invent it.<\/span><\/p>\n <\/span><\/p>\n Lovers on Aran<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n The timeless waves, bright, sifting,<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n broken glass,<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n Came dazzling around, into the rocks,<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n Came glinting, sifting from the<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n Americas<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n To posess Aran. Or did Aran rush<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n\n
\n
\n
\n
\n